For quantitative professionals, the Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) is a fundamental model, especially known for its incorporation of volatility adjustment, a critical factor in enhancing the
precision of financial forecasts.
It is lauded for its adeptness in capturing the stochastic nature of stock price movements, offering quantifiable metrics that drive strategic decision-making, particularly in the complex domain
of option pricing.
Stock prices, with their inherent unpredictability and susceptibility to a plethora of market forces, necessitate sophisticated modeling techniques. The GBM model is characterized by its
parameterization of constant drift (μ), representing the deterministic trend, and volatility (σ), embodying the random fluctuations echoing the market’s intrinsic uncertainty.
In financial modeling, Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) is pivotal. The core differential equation is
dS_t = μS_t dt + σS_t dW_t.
Here, µ denotes the expected return rate, σ is the standard deviation of the stock’s returns (volatility), dt represents an infinitesimal time increment, and dWt is the Wiener process, indicating
random market fluctuations.
Upon integration, it transforms to
S_t = S_0 * exp((μ - 0.5σ^2)t + σW_t)
Where S_0 is the initial stock price, S_t the stock price at time t, μ represents the expected return, σ the volatility, and W_t a standard Brownian motion.
A core challenge in financial mathematics is addressing the asymmetrical behavior of stock prices. A stock experiencing a 50% decrease and subsequently a 50% increase does not return to its
original value but incurs a net loss.
In the GBM equation, the term -0.5*σ^2 quantifies and corrects the inflated growth trajectory inherent in continuous compounding. Mathematically, it adjusts the mean return rate by a factor
dependent on the variance of returns (σ^2), rendering a more realistic, probabilistically balanced price evolution trajectory.
In the context of Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM), the term -0.5σ^2 is subtracted to correct for the effect of compounding. Stock returns are compounded over time; thus, the expected return isn’t
simply μ but rather is adjusted downwards to account for the volatility.
In contrast, the Black-Scholes (BS) model introduces an upward adjustment to volatility, essentially adding back a volatility premium when calculating option prices. This difference arises from
the nature and purpose of the two models. GBM is primarily used for modeling stock prices, while the BS model is used for option pricing.
In the BS model, the addition of the 0.5σ^2 term in the calculation of d1 reflects the increased risk associated with options. It ensures that the option’s price is sufficiently sensitive to the
underlying asset’s future volatility, essentially factoring in the risk premium associated with the option.
Écrire commentaire